Finance Blogs

Scott Adams on Board Governance
From Financial Rounds
January 19, 2008 4:40 PM
Corporate governance survey conducted (Pakistan)
From Inside Sarbanes Oxley
January 19, 2008 12:13 AM
Enron-driven reforms are unraveling
From Inside Sarbanes Oxley
January 19, 2008 12:06 AM
More...

The Finance Institute

Tackling T&E Expense Reports
Webcasts
Performance Management – It's Not Just About Technology
Webcasts
More...

Diverts

73-Year-Old Man Makes Basketball History
Ken Mink, a 73-year-old student at Roane State Community College, set a new record this week -- he became the oldest person to score in a US college basketball game. [more]

More Diverts

Business Purchasing

Business Finance has partnered with BuyerZone.com to make it easy for you to find advice and tools for your business purchases. BuyerZone's free Request for Quotes service quickly connects you with suppliers of over 150 product, service and equipment categories. They also have hundreds of articles full of purchasing advice and insider tips. Click here to review some of the most common purchases that face your business.

On Your Desktop

Add SearchFinance to your desktop using the Yahoo! Widget Engine:

SearchFinance Widget

From the Blogosphere

May 14, 2007 12:46 AM
From Blog: David Loshin

My company has been involved in a lot of data governance work recently. Two of the mian drivers are regulatory compliance and consistency in reporting (which often rolls back to compliance). Interestingly, in some of the client industries, fraud detection seems to be an additional driver. This is a little curious to me. On the one hand, fraud detection fits into the compliance framework - looking for non-conformance to business policies. In both cases, we essentially identify critical policies, rules that indicate conformance to those policies, and generate alerts when those policies are violated.

The difference is that compliance is introspective while fraud detection is outward looking. Compliance seeks to guard your own behavior, looking for how the organization is living up to everyone else's expectations. Fraud detection is outwardlooking, seeking to figure out how your own rules are being transgressed by others.

I can imagine another significant difference - fraud is performed proactively, with the perpetrators intentionally trying to avoid detection. Compliance issues are potentially intentional, but inadvertent non-compliance is certainly targeted by control processes.

This raises a different business challenge: it may be possible that there are corporate business policies that conflict with externally-imposed regulations. If so, does the issue of compliance change from self-policing to weighing the risk of noncomplaince with the risk of getting caught? And if the latter is the case, it suggests that internal governance programs are "window-dressing," especially when the real (i.e., intentional) transgressions are going to be well-hidden.

[ Read the entire post at Blog: David Loshin ] Open in this window Open in a new window

Other recent entries from Blog: David Loshin:

Corporate Finance Channels

Media

WebcastsWebcasts

Upcoming
Achieving GRC Success: Implementation Case Studies
From Business Finance Magazine
Managing Expenses to Drive Down Costs in an Uncertain Economy
From Business Finance Magazine
More
Archived
Planning and Budgeting for SMBs -- Why Automating is the Answer
From Business Finance Magazine
A Savvy Buyer's Guide to HSAs: Lessons from the First Four Years of the Health Savings Account
From Business Finance Magazine
More

PodcastsPodcasts

Standards: Convergence
From CPApodcasts
The End of Free Money
From John B. Levy & Company
More

ResearchResearch

Corporate Responsibility: Burden or Opportunity?
From Grant Thornton
FEI/FERF Survey Of Executive Compensation For Financial Executives
From Financial Executives International
More

VideoVideo

More

Add SearchFinance To Your Site

Add SearchFinance to your own site! Details here.